Err...but Najib is pretty close to Sin Chew. It is more of capitalising on the sentimental value of The Malaysia Daily News. Seriously, the paper (Malaysia Daily) brought back a lot of my good memories.
别以为小报没用,大报就自以是.那何必拿小报来做后备胎.I strongly belief that Sin Chew must have received information regarding the renewal of their printing permit and that was why they were trying to re-dress Malaysia Daily News and put them in a different plate form from it is now. I think we should not make too many commence as the owner might not be happy and stop using Malaysia Daily News as the Print Media in Sarikei, Bintangor region.
As for me, I think the theory is simple, if there is demand, then there is always supply. If the readers really urge for Malaysia Daily, then the owner should have given grand presentation and priority earlier. The question we should ask is, are we really keen to have the paper? Are we going to show our strongest support by subscription and advertisements' insertion? If we aren't, then we have not much to say, right? As we go back to the history, the real fact was that, Malaysia Daily faced difficulty without strong support from the grassroots; the paper itself was too conservative and not aggressively run or operated. To be fair, for those who criticised so much all these years, are they really prepared to show their strongest support? If yes, then show by action.
11 条评论:
星洲可能怕納吉上台算帳，以馬報預備後路......該報記者不是被逮捕過了嗎，可能叫該報停刊一個星期也不一定，到時就以馬報代替囉！
observer
我的分析与你差不多。
无论如何，看到马报变脸上阵，感觉还是挺怀念的，毕竟曾在那里待过七年啊。
有沒有發覺，馬報的招牌字，本是紅字，到了星洲成為白字紅底，今天起成為白字青底－－馬報招牌已變色也！
馬報有如妾身，寄居星洲，前景未明......
礼弟，我在Kuching新州日报没有看到马来西亚日报的版本
Err...but Najib is pretty close to Sin Chew. It is more of capitalising on the sentimental value of The Malaysia Daily News. Seriously, the paper (Malaysia Daily) brought back a lot of my good memories.
别以为小报没用,大报就自以是.那何必拿小报来做后备胎.I strongly belief that Sin Chew must have received information regarding the renewal of their printing permit and that was why they were trying to re-dress Malaysia Daily News and put them in a different plate form from it is now. I think we should not make too many commence as the owner might not be happy and stop using Malaysia Daily News as the Print Media in Sarikei, Bintangor region.
原来你们有这么多的感触！而我只是看外表而已！真是罪过罪过！
政海波濤難以預測；
報海同樣洶湧詭譎
As for me, I think the theory is simple, if there is demand, then there is always supply. If the readers really urge for Malaysia Daily, then the owner should have given grand presentation and priority earlier. The question we should ask is, are we really keen to have the paper? Are we going to show our strongest support by subscription and advertisements' insertion? If we aren't, then we have not much to say, right? As we go back to the history, the real fact was that, Malaysia Daily faced difficulty without strong support from the grassroots; the paper itself was too conservative and not aggressively run or operated.
To be fair, for those who criticised so much all these years, are they really prepared to show their strongest support? If yes, then show by action.
諸位鄉親父老，
謝謝大家寶貴comment，對馬報的懷念是因為過去在馬報工作的人的抒發情感；後來馬報被收購了，對於買主與賣主都有怨言在所難免;不過事實上，目前的馬報已不是過去的馬報了，所以對曾在馬報上班的人有追念與現實的矛盾......Blog的文字往往只是即興的，感性的，所以也不用太serious，也不用太計較......誰對誰錯，有些事情還有待歷史去判斷吧！
喂！各位，有没有发觉马报越来越有看头？
深深感觉，不论是版面呈献还有设计，都比老马报有亮点。
我个人殷切认为，我们应该拥护和支持这样的呈献和回报。
作为移到民都鲁的民丹莪人，我欢迎马报的改革，特别是看
更多老家和周遭的讯息，图文并茂。赞!
发表评论