I agreed. Its a matter of marginalisation - actually should consider to apply as cultural heritage instead! Once demolished, the historical significance is lost forever, the sad fact is chinese is good at marginalising themselves!
有觉醒的心，真好。行动呢？可以拍记录片吗？拍吧！乡亲们，把这些有心人的看法都拍进历史的殿堂里。HOOVER HOUSE 可以在这地点上随岁月而消失，但这份觉醒的心可以代代相传。。像以色列民到如今仍然活在，连线，连系，连属在所罗们王所建的圣殿情景里。。有机会重建吗？不晓得。但，那历史的情操，文化的承继，生命的传真，翊翊如生在生活里，在信仰里，在岁月里，在现在里。。也许，这是真正保留历史文化生命的挑战吧。不知为什么，坐在天鹅江河畔，听见这么多有心人的谈话，我不知是听见天鹅江畔的心脉，还是江畔上有心人的觉醒。。江河的水溢满了我的心胸，流湿了我的衣衣襟。。
I am indeed saddened by the thought that the Hoover House has to go from the present location. Could it be that portion of it, at the least, be preserved there? 0f course, moving it to another place----now to the Hoover Memorial Park----given the appropriate name, may connote some similar implications, but is there guarantee that some of the original materials used in the House be used again?
Any kind of change will bring pain.However, if change is for improvemnet, for the good of the people and society, I believe it should be carried out. Attitudes are important. The way you look at it will determine the next step or thought you will take.
The Hoover House is the place where I taught Sunday School for many years in the 60s when Dr. Douglas P. Coole and his wife were living there. It is certainly a place where memories come and go year in and year out. It has played an important role in my high school years learning how to help the young children.
Then came Dr. Gail Harris, daughter of Mr and Mrs John A. Pilley, and his friend, Ms MacGraw, whose parents were missionaries to Sibu back in the late 50s. They expressed their wish to have the House preserved. They spent many childhood years in the House. They revisited Sibu only just a few months ago and they relived in their play room and bedrooms which they had left some 50 years ago.
JUST ONE REMINDER:The Hoover House to be relocated in the Hoover Memorial Park should maintain as far as possible close resemblance of the present Hoover House. Additional facilities may be provided, but the originality of such a precious Methodist Heritage should not be sacrificed just simply because of convenience, costs or other developments.
May God continue to bless this House in the new location in the future so that many who come to know it will be greatly encouraged and rewarded.
21 条评论:
絕對可行。可以把原來的拆了，搬去另一個地方，再將之搭起來。問題是，有人願意付出這樣的代價嗎？
本人認為歷史可貴，是無價寶，後人確實有責任保存。
絕對可行的，好比香港的美利樓－－「美利樓建於1846年，坐落於中國銀行現址。樓高3層，屬英國喬治王朝風格的建築，曾為當時駐港英軍的宿舍。1982年拆卸時，所有石塊及其他部分都編上號碼，以備日後重建。美利樓的特色在於其鋪上瓷磚寬敞的走廊，花崗石柱及金字形屋頂。1998年香港房屋委員會負責在赤柱按照原貌重建，美利樓成為赤柱廣場的一部分。從美利樓右邊的露台可欣賞赤柱灣的全貌；另一邊通往天后廟的行人道則用了從上海街搬來的石柱作裝飾。」
為何不可?褔源堂就曾經把原來舊聖堂的建築材料給愛民堂用....你到那里可以找到舊褔源堂的影子....
但另一方面...從另一個角度來探討:
為何要到拆以前才有更多的反對聲呢?
若能在決定計劃(巳是好几年的計劃)執行以前便反對...則對當局來說更容易作出對策!!
惹人笑话....
非拆吗,就别婆婆妈妈....
认真想想, 世上一切都是毫无存念的,
要做就向前看, 不然就不用考虑其他,
做的多好看, 荣誉也不过是暂时的...
别再腥腥相惜了!
我們寕可丟棄記憶,
只為換取一個叫進步的東西
绝对可行，我们的下一代会认为 Hoover House 是建立在富雅各紀念公園里。
rebuild where? with what? when? Will it still be named Hoover House? or Hoover Building or Hoover Enterprise or what?
想发表：
若必须被册除，那就绝对赞同搬建！
那栋建筑物虽对现代信徒（后代或
'理所当然'信徒〕没太大影响力，不过确实是犀鸟乡卫理公会的精神起点。是必须成为未来及现今感恩及提醒的标志！神的恩典是昔在今在永在的神；该懂得回首，感恩，携手再走！不忘本，不自夸，才不重蹈覆辙。荣耀主为先！
当然。。
不过若决定搬迁，前后过程并不简单。求神赐委身的心灵及恩典于当中的信徒！
以马内力^^
搬遷意義不大, 一般對老建築進行搬遷, 主要在於建築本身具有特殊的文化或藝術價值, 如其建築營造技術已不多見, 或結構中具有藝術成份： 如：壁畫或雕塑等。就富雅各屋而言, 它價值在於建築所承載的歷史訊息及生活記錄, 如它是早年宣教士生活場景 /愛蓮街衛理教區發展的見証。因此, 脫離了它的原生地, 富雅各屋即失去它原有的歷史蘊涵。
在此情形下, 選擇搬遷, 與用同樣建材易地仿建, 其實沒有兩樣。
存在與消失，真的沒有分別嗎？
搬遷，意義可以繼續傳遞。若消食，就什麼也沒了。
Im not agree!
I agreed.
Its a matter of marginalisation - actually should consider to apply as cultural heritage instead!
Once demolished, the historical significance is lost forever, the sad fact is chinese is good at marginalising themselves!
不同意的，是不認識何謂文化遺產吧？
站在愛護文化遺產的立場,雖然富雅各屋僅僅是一棟曾經由宣教士住過的大樓,然而它的價值卻遠非屋子本身可以比擬的.
這個地方是衛理公會發展的一個里程碑,建築本身就是一個印證,你可以在任何地方紀念任何人,任何事,你總不能將歷史重寫吧?
現在有一棟建築做為活生生的教材你不要,偏要搬去你認為"更適合"的地方,然後美其名為紀念.難道非要搬了才能紀念?
富雅各屋應該不是只有紀念的意義而已.它是砂拉越歷史的一部份,更是衛理公會歷史的一部份,它雖經風雨,現在仍然存在,這已是一件很了不起的事,表明衛理公會與這個地方不可分割的歷史意義.
好了,為了"發展",跟著潮流走,與世俗的眼光沒有兩樣,似乎欠缺了做為"引路明燈"該有的風範.
富雅各屋做為文化遺產的一部份,還可以做為砂拉越衛理公會發展展示館或教會文物館,它獨特的建築結構,就是最吸引人的展品....這些,都不是"紀念"兩個字可以相提並論的.
我只是感到可惜,既然已有的,我們還不要,就只有留待歷史來做最公平的評論了.
提到福源堂原有建築物搬到保由路成為愛民堂,做為從小在福源堂長大的一份子,憑良心說,我真得在愛民堂看不到一絲的福源堂影子,更不必說對它的懷念了.
我真心希望,教會當局能在發展之外,再看遠一點....再看遠一點點.
上面那位說的不錯啊。
誰可以做頭到時十一月間發起圍城－HOOVER HOUSE活動，以維護古屋的活動嗎？
有觉醒的心，真好。行动呢？可以拍记录片吗？拍吧！乡亲们，把这些有心人的看法都拍进历史的殿堂里。HOOVER HOUSE 可以在这地点上随岁月而消失，但这份觉醒的心可以代代相传。。像以色列民到如今仍然活在，连线，连系，连属在所罗们王所建的圣殿情景里。。有机会重建吗？不晓得。但，那历史的情操，文化的承继，生命的传真，翊翊如生在生活里，在信仰里，在岁月里，在现在里。。也许，这是真正保留历史文化生命的挑战吧。不知为什么，坐在天鹅江河畔，听见这么多有心人的谈话，我不知是听见天鹅江畔的心脉，还是江畔上有心人的觉醒。。江河的水溢满了我的心胸，流湿了我的衣衣襟。。
不要像那些牧師只會說說說！誰帶頭行動啊？可惜本人不在鄉。
I am indeed saddened by the thought that the Hoover House has to go from the present location. Could it be that portion of it, at the least, be preserved there? 0f course, moving it to another place----now to the Hoover Memorial Park----given the appropriate name, may connote some similar implications, but is there guarantee that some of the original materials used in the House be used again?
Any kind of change will bring pain.However, if change is for improvemnet, for the good of the people and society, I believe it should be carried out. Attitudes are important. The way you look at it will determine the next step or thought you will take.
The Hoover House is the place where I taught Sunday School for many years in the 60s when Dr. Douglas P. Coole and his wife were living there. It is certainly a place where memories come and go year in and year out. It has played an important role in my high school years learning how to help the young children.
Then came Dr. Gail Harris, daughter of Mr and Mrs John A. Pilley, and his friend, Ms MacGraw, whose parents were missionaries to Sibu back in the late 50s. They expressed their wish to have the House preserved. They spent many childhood years in the House. They revisited Sibu only just a few months ago and they relived in their play room and bedrooms which they had left some 50 years ago.
JUST ONE REMINDER:The Hoover House to be relocated in the Hoover Memorial Park should maintain as far as possible close resemblance of the present Hoover House. Additional facilities may be provided, but the originality of such a precious Methodist Heritage should not be sacrificed just simply because of convenience, costs or other developments.
May God continue to bless this House in the new location in the future so that many who come to know it will be greatly encouraged
and rewarded.
发表评论